[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Handle-info] Overriding HandleStorage



I opened up 2642 and it seems to be the same speed as before.

> On Mar 30, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Bartos, Christopher <bartos.25@osu.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My plan is to open udp and tcp on port 2642. Thanks for all your help. Sorry, Jane, for not seeing your email last week.
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> 
> Forgive the typo... your 1811.1 prefix advertises service on UDP 2642 (not 2641).
> 
> Robert
> 
>> On 2016-03-30, at 13:36, Robert Tupelo-Schneck <schneck@cnri.reston.va.us> wrote:
>> 
>> Chris, your 1811 server is open to public resolution at UDP 2641, TCP 2641, and HTTP 8000.
>> 
>> Your 1811.1 server is only open on HTTP 8002, but your prefix does advertise service on UDP 2641 and TCP 2642.  As Scott suggested, this is why resolution is slow.
>> 
>> Best is to open UDP 2642 and TCP 2642 at your firewall.  If strictly necessary, CNRI can change your prefix information to advertise only TCP 8002.
>> 
>> On a separate note, the resolution behavior at 1811.1 is unusual.  So 1811.1/1112 resolves to the same value at 1811/1112.  I'm curious to hear more about the value of that to you.  Do you want 1811/1112 to be the public handle of record, as it were, or 1811.1/1112?
>> 
>> Also, you should check your spam filter, as Jane Euler at CNRI emailed you about the matter of the ports being closed last week.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Robert
>> 
>>> On 2016-03-30, at 12:46, Scott Prater <scott.prater@wisc.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, that would most definitely be a cause for a delay.  Can you temporarily open the handle server TCP and UDP ports to the world, as see if the resolution is faster?
>>> 
>>> -- Scott
>>> 
>>> On 03/30/2016 11:40 AM, Bartos, Christopher wrote:
>>>> The only ones we have open to the world is our HTTP protocols opened on
>>>> 8002 where the handle server is running on.
>>>> 
>>>> We have 2 handle servers 1) DSpace instance and 2) Regular Handle Server
>>>> 
>>>> They are running on HTTP 8000 and HTTP 8002 respectively. Neither of the
>>>> UDP / TCP ports are open to the world. Would that be cause of slowness?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 30, 2016, at 12:24 PM, Scott Prater <scott.prater@wisc.edu
>>>>> <mailto:scott.prater@wisc.edu>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What ports do you have open to the world on your handle server, to
>>>>> which protocols?  In my experience, slowness in resolution is usually
>>>>> because the udp handle port is closed to the world, causing the client
>>>>> to fall back to tcp, and maybe even http, to resolve.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looking at the output of the handle client as it attempts to resolve
>>>>> will give you a hint as to where the delay is.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- Scott
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 03/30/2016 10:46 AM, Bartos, Christopher wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've overridden the HandleStorage class in Handle Server so that it will
>>>>>> attempt to resolve a specific prefix internally, and if it doesn’t
>>>>>> resolve, it will attempt to resolve itself, meaning, it runs the normal
>>>>>> BDJBEHandleStorage class to resolve it’s own handle.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Here is my new class:
>>>>>> https://github.com/lupulin/MultiServerHandleStorage/blob/master/MultiServerHandleStorage.java
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My question: it’s pretty quick locally. You can check it:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://140.254.87.133:8002/1811.1/OSU123 will resolve itself.
>>>>>> http://140.254.87.133:8002/1811.1/1112 will resolve a different handle
>>>>>> server.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, going through hdl.handle.net <http://hdl.handle.net>:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://hdl.handle.net/1811.1/OSU123andhttp://hdl.handle.net/1811.1/1112
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is very, very slow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My question, is that I’m wondering if there is a way that we can speed
>>>>>> up the HandleStorage implementation on our side or if there is nothing
>>>>>> we can do. Also, if there is a better way to do what we are attempting.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our goal is to have 2 handle servers, both with the same prefix, but the
>>>>>> one that is publicly available will use our custom HandleStorage class.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Handle-Info mailing list
>>>>>> Handle-Info@cnri.reston.va.us <mailto:Handle-Info@cnri.reston.va.us>
>>>>>> http://www.handle.net/mailman/listinfo/handle-info
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Scott Prater
>>>>> Shared Development Group
>>>>> General Library System
>>>>> University of Wisconsin - Madison
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Scott Prater
>>> Shared Development Group
>>> General Library System
>>> University of Wisconsin - Madison
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Handle-Info mailing list
>>> Handle-Info@cnri.reston.va.us
>>> http://www.handle.net/mailman/listinfo/handle-info
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Handle-Info mailing list
> Handle-Info@cnri.reston.va.us
> http://www.handle.net/mailman/listinfo/handle-info

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Handle-Info mailing list
Handle-Info@cnri.reston.va.us
http://www.handle.net/mailman/listinfo/handle-info